I’ve Twitter DM’d one of the core members of ReadTheDocs asking for help.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:43 AM Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hen happy 4th looks like a brand mgmt. topic to me… > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > From: Hen <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 10:44 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Abandoned MXNet readthedocs site > > > > Chris/Mark - is this a Legal (Chris) topic or a Brand Management (Mark) > > topic? > > > > I’m hesitant to use a Trademark C&D for what’s in effect a lost account, > > but that’s what readthedocs seem to be asking for. > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:15 PM Markham, Aaron <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, just bumping this issue again. Can we get a trademark C&D sent to the > > readthedocs folks, so they'll go ahead and remove the derelict website? > > It's still the #4 result in Google for "mxnet install". > > > > What's Apache's process? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > On 5/16/18, 8:20 AM, "Hen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It seems we (Apache MXNet) have an old documentation site posted at: > > > > https://newdocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > > > > and only the absent @Awyan has the permissions to the site. See > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10409 for more > > details. > > > > Raising this with readthedocs.org, we've been asked to submit a DMCA > > request to take down the account: > > > > https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org/issues/4042 > > > > Given our docs are Apache licensed I suspect it's really a trademark > > takedown (confused users etc). Does anyone here have any guidance with > > this > > situation? Has anyone had this issue with readthedocs before? Should > > we be > > sending them a Trademark takedown request? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > > >
