Hi,
BTW: Why not doing a 1.0-beta-6 instead of 1.0-beta-5.1 ?
Based on the developer process
(http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/process.html):
x.y.z-beta-n
Beta version, complete for the next release, not fully
tested/documented.
> A quick fix version for 1.0-beta-5...
We solved 2 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11362&version=19637
The link points to 1.0-beta-5 instead of 1.0-beta-5.1
The correct link is in my opinion:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11362&version=19873
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
+1
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
