Hello Anders, as all other sites (even for SNAPSHOTs of sandbox plugins) reside directly beneath mojo.codehaus.org and the site plugin replaces http://mojo.codehaus.org in links, you get:
<img src="../images/mojo_logo.png" alt="Mojo"> which should probably be ../../images/mojo_logo.png or /images/mojo_logo.png I just site-deployed the site for the sandboxed ckjm-maven-plugin, see: http://mojo.codehaus.org/ckjm-maven-plugin/index.html One thing which seems not to work correctly are external links: I wanted to link to Spirellis' CKJM homepage (see https://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/~raw,r=15434/mojo/trunk/sandbox/ckjm-maven-plugin/src/site/site.xml) but the link is not rendered at all. I am all for replacing the antique standard skin with the fluido one :-) Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 20:58, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > As part of MOJO-1786, I've changed to the maven-fluido-skin in > mojo-parent and deployed a new snapshot. Also, I've published an > example mojo's site to: > http://mojo.codehaus.org/fluido-preview/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/ > > I have absolutely no clue why the logos have been removed...:-) > > /Anders > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:41, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree, it shouldn't look like a collection of homepages ;) >> The only thing I can think of is replacing one of the banner images. >> @Christopher, do you have concrete examples of you suggestion? >> >> -Robert >>> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:31:32 +0100 >>> From: [email protected] >> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos >>> >>> Regarding allowing each mojo to have their own skin, I'm not in favor >>> of that. I think that all our mojos should have the same documentation >>> look 'n' feel. >>> >>> /Anders >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 22:26, Christopher Hunt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > +1 to upgrade the MOJO to use this as a default set of skins. They look >>> > great. >>> > >>> > In addition I feel that it would be nice to let plugin authors skin >>> > their pages in different ways; perhaps via a vote. >>> > >>> > On 29/11/2011, at 7:48 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: >>> > >>> >> An new skin, maven-fluido-skin [1], was recently released by the >>> >> Apache Maven project. For the JAXB mojo, a patch submitter requested >>> >> us to use that as he needs it for the documentation part. >>> >> >>> >> Should we use that for our mojos? Should we use a consistent skin for >>> >> all mojos? >>> >> >>> >> Here's an example of using the new skin for a plugin: >>> >> http://mybatis.org/maven-migration-plugin/ >>> >> >>> >> /Anders >>> >> >>> >> [1] http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/ >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >> >>> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> > >>> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
