You're right. I change it. thx Arnaud
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Revision >> 9188 <http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/mojo/?cs=9188> >> Author >> aheritier >> Date >> 2009-03-10 13:43:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Mar 2009) >> >> >> Log Message >> >> MIDLJ-8 <http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MIDLJ-8> : >> Generated java files not found by java compiler >> >> >> Modified: >> >> >> trunk/mojo/idlj-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/idlj/TestIDLJMojo.java >> (9187 => 9188) >> >> --- >> trunk/mojo/idlj-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/idlj/TestIDLJMojo.java >> 2009-03-10 17:49:03 UTC (rev 9187) >> +++ >> trunk/mojo/idlj-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/idlj/TestIDLJMojo.java >> 2009-03-10 18:43:45 UTC (rev 9188) >> @@ -77,4 +77,13 @@ >> { >> return includeDirs; >> } >> + + >> + /** >> + * //TODO ???? >> + */ >> + protected void addCompileSourceRoot() >> + { + getProject().addCompileSourceRoot( >> getOutputDirectory().getAbsolutePath() ); >> + } >> > > Regarding the name of the mojo and its default phase binding, shouldn't > that be added as a test compile source root instead of a normal compile > source root? > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Arnaud
