On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:04:14 +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, > > I think it's time to stop discussing for ever and to start a vote. > > MINA 2.0.0-Mx is around for months now, and we have more and more > users developing applications around it. We have tons of proposal to > improve MINA, but many of them are pretty drastic, and may jeopardize > our users' investment. OTOS, if we close MINA 2.0 now, we also close > the door to some very important features and improvement we want to > have in MINA, which will be differed for months if we start a 3.0. > > So the best would be to determinate which strategy should be the > best. Here is a proposal. > [snip..] > [] Continue to add new features to MINA 2.0 milestones until we reach > a stable point > [X] Freeze the code, move to MINA 2.0-RC1 > [] I abstain > > [snip..] Agreeing on feature freeze but until doc isn't better no way to release an RC. Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
