My wife had a suggestion... why not make the M in maven out of two tee pees... linking in with the Apache theme...
So I present maven-19: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/38569278/maven-19.png?version=1&modificationDate=1389695638903&api=v2 and finding a use for the feather maven-20: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/38569278/maven-20.png?version=1&modificationDate=1389695654233&api=v2 On 14 January 2014 10:35, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>wrote: > As a homage to Roy's wife, may I present > > maven-18: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/38569278/maven-18.png?version=1&modificationDate=1389695623134&api=v2 > > > On 13 January 2014 15:36, Lyons, Roy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I asked my wife on the drive to the train today what animal she thinks >> fits Maven. Her response made me chuckle. >> >> Without hesitation, she said "Honey Badger" >> >> When I asked why, she said that Honey Badgers are part of nature and >> generally do their thing nicely -- but if you piss it off, things will get >> really really bad... She said she had the same experience with Maven. It >> works nicely, but if you try to do something really non-standard, you will >> feel its wrath :) >> >> Heh. >> >> Anyhow, I thought it was funny enough to share - not really a serious >> consideration to make a Honey Badger our mascot. >> >> On 1/10/14 1:20 AM, "Kristian Rosenvold" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >I think the association-work around what maven /is/ is a great way to >> >approach a logo contest elsewhere. I have worked with some great graphic >> >designers in my time, and the kind input the good ones want are typically >> >related around your thoughts/feelings around the product rather than >> which >> >particular animal you prefer, which is a bit of a secondary kind of input >> >along with all different kinds of other constraints/ideas (the boss >> >prefers >> >blue). >> > >> >When I first encountered maven I had come to the realization that all my >> >ant projects were basically the same, and that there was no reason for >> >customizing >> >what was basically a standard process. So maven gives me associations to >> a >> >mass-production line at a factory, rather than a tailor making individual >> >processes. Furthermore, the lifecycle amplifies the idea of a >> >conveyor-belt >> >mass-production line; all parts move through the same conveyor belt >> >process, stopping at >> >individual stages to get work done. I would almost be willing to think of >> >a >> >waterfall (Uh-oh...) >> > >> >So it would appear to me that I'm not thinking of an animal at all ! >> > >> >Kristian >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >2014/1/9 Mark H. Wood <[email protected]> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:32:54AM -0600, Curtis Rueden wrote: >> >> > All of the logos are OK, but none of them really symbolize anything >> in >> >> > particular about Maven. IMO the best logos encapsulate the purpose of >> >>the >> >> > project somehow, either overtly, covertly or both. >> >> >> >> Good point. I was associating with the name "Maven", looking for a >> >> symbol of in-depth understanding of a specialized field. >> >> >> >> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/maven >> >> >> >> So, what does Maven do? It passes unique source and object code >> >> inputs through a standardized process, guided by an expression of the >> >> relationships among those inputs, to assemble a well-specified >> >> configuration of runnable code. What does that look like? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [email protected] >> >> Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient. >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
