That's me being imprecise based on something I picked off google; i changed the wiki.
It would appear to me that the ASM based plugins are in for a decent bit of work (at least shade seems to be). Some of them are using fairly old versions of asm too, and I considered porting shade to 4.2 to minimize diff up to 5.0. Do you know anything about the differences between asm 4.2 and 5.0 are significant in terms of api breakage ? Kristian 2013/12/19 Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> > On 19 Dec 2013, at 08:08, Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> > wrote: > > > I figured we could use the wiki page to eventually document for end users > > which versions need to be used to solve known problems etc. While we're > > still fixing them and we're still ea it's probably a good place for just > > sharing knowledge, since general stuff will tend to get hidden in jira. > > jMNG-5551 is good for keeping tabs on what's actually known :) > > Just wondering about the comment "Current ASM-5 beta not usable” - in what > way is it not usable and has it been reported upstream? > > > Kristian > > > > 2013/12/19 Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> > > > >> I just created > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+8+Upgrade to > track > >> the status of java 8 migration "problems". This includes the bug number > for > >> the bugs.sun.com bug report I just filed yesterday that makes verifier > >> break. > >> > >> Kristian > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
