Agreed, but as discussed the nicer appaoach would be to use tags in the form 3.1.0-0...N and then point the final tag at the hash pointed to by the successful spin's tag, if you insist on this whole respinning thing.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, drop the older one. > > On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Jason, > > > > It seems we have 2 tags in Git for maven 3.1 : maven-3.1 and maven-3.1.0 > > I think that the the right one to keep is the second one (893ca28 - 28th > > June) ? > > I suppose we need to drop the old maven-3.1 tag ? > > > > Cheers, > > > > ----- > > Arnaud Héritier > > http://aheritier.net > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.) > > > > > > >
