Non-bindingly: +1 for pre-releases -1 for actual releases Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> wrote: > You're right, my bad. I just re-read the details in Stephen's original mail. > > So I'm also: > +1 for pre-releases, dropping everything to reuse numbers is not worth the > hassle > -1 for actual releases: it would create more mess imo for end users if > there's many bizarre jumps in numbering > > > 2013/5/29 Fred Cooke <[email protected]> > >> "This vote is to change the policy to: >> >> drop the staging repo, document the release as not released, and run with >> the next version." >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Well, from the wording of the VOTE question and what I've read from you >> > Fred in the past, shouldn't actually be a -1 from you here? >> > >> > What I read is "Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version >> > number?" then >> > +1 = current way of working, just drop the release and re-release >> (possibly >> > with "take n" in the subject mail, and so on) >> > -1 = please do not reuse number, numbers are cheap >> > >> > Was it what you intended to vote on, and was it how Stephen was thinking >> to >> > orient the sentence and the +1/-1 meaning? >> > >> > >> > 2013/5/29 Fred Cooke <[email protected]> >> > >> > > +1(million) non-binding, but if you want, I'll have your children if >> you >> > > make this extremely positive change!!!! <3 >> > > >> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jörg Schaible < >> > > [email protected] >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > -1 (nb) >> > > > >> > > > Stephen Connolly wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > We have been using a policy of only making releases without >> skipping >> > > > > version numbers, e.g. >> > > > > >> > > > > 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, etc >> > > > > >> > > > > Whereby if there is something wrong with the artifacts staged for >> > > > release, >> > > > > we drop the staging repo, delete the tag, roll back the version, >> and >> > > run >> > > > > again. >> > > > > >> > > > > This vote is to change the policy to: >> > > > > >> > > > > drop the staging repo, document the release as not released, and >> run >> > > with >> > > > > the next version. >> > > > > >> > > > > Under this new proposal, if the staged artifacts for 3.1.0 fail to >> > meet >> > > > > the release criteria, then the artifacts would be dropped from the >> > > > staging >> > > > > repository and never see the light of day. The tag would remain in >> > SCM, >> > > > > and we would document (somewhere) that the release was cancelled. >> The >> > > > > "respin" would have version number 3.1.1 and there would never be a >> > > > 3.1.0. >> > > > > >> > > > > This change could mean that the first actual release of 3.1.x might >> > end >> > > > up >> > > > > being 3.1.67 (though I personally view that as unlikely, and in the >> > > > > context of 3.1.x I think we are very nearly there) >> > > > > >> > > > > Please Note: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#Check_the_vote_resultsdoes >> > > > > not actually specify what it means by "the process will need to be >> > > > > restarted" so this vote will effect a change either outcome >> > > > > >> > > > > +1: Never respin with the same version number, always increment the >> > > > > version for a respin >> > > > > 0: Don't care >> > > > > -1: Always respin with the same version number until that version >> > > number >> > > > > gets released >> > > > > >> > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours. A Majority of PMC votes >> greater >> > > that >> > > > > 3 will be deemed as decisive in either direction (i.e. if the sum >> is >> > < >> > > -3 >> > > > > or >> > > > >> +3 then there is a documented result) >> > > > > >> > > > > For any releases in progress at this point in time, it is up to the >> > > > > release manager to decide what to do if they need to do a respin. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Stephen >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >> > Sauvez un arbre, >> > Mangez un castor ! >> > >> > > > > -- > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net > Sauvez un arbre, > Mangez un castor ! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
