For some reason I'm not grokking the use case, but I can comment on the syntax anyway...
On 26/05/2013, at 1:31 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing an issue with the includes/excludes for the maven-invoker-plugin > which needs a Maven-wide solution where includes/excludes are used. > When having several execution-blocks, each with its own includes, then I > can't use -Dinvoker.test=sometestA, sometestB anymore, because it will be > used for every execution-block, causing most of the tests to fail. > > I'm looking for something like -Dinvoker.test=<someTestA,someTestB> or > [someTestA,someTestB], so these tests are only executed if they are a > subcollection of the includes/excludes of the execution-block. Would a different parameter for this be appropriate? e.g. -Dinvoker.test.in=someTestA,someTestB > > The '<>'-markup has the disadvantage that it can't be used within the pom > without being escaped, but I think this markup should primary be used on > cmdline. That's even worse on the command line :) > The '[]' and '()'-markup reflect ranges, I don't think that's correct here. > '{}'-markup is related to expressions. Personally I'd use () for a set. While they do have a special meaning when describing an interval, they're also used to describe sets. That said, they (as with the others) can cause some grief for shell scripts or quoting, so if you can avoid them it's probably better. - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
