I got lost (in other work) and this thread a long time ago. Can someone please remind me just why we are changing the logging at all?
-Chris On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < [email protected]> wrote: > 2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: > > Perso I'm fine using log4j2. > > I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy. > > Log4j2 has quickly added a feature I needed and release it. > > Furthermore I'm fine working with an Apache community in case of any > > issue we could have. > > I'm not entirely sure I follow where this discussion is actually > going, but I'm firmly opposed > to including a brand new logging framework as default in m3. > > Kristian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
