I had a look at the IT output and found this log message
[DEBUG] Skipped remote update check for org.apache.maven.its.dependency:purge-
local-repository:pom:1.0, already updated during this session.

the code causaing this message is in Aether

I doubt maven-dependency-tree will do anything about this problem: this seems 
to be a cache feature of Aether we exceptionnaly don't want

IMHO, if we used resolver.resolveAlways() API (like it was done in previous m-
dependency-p version), this cache should be avoided but I tried and it didn't 
change anything
but this time, this would be a Maven core bug :)

WDYT?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 24 octobre 2012 08:56:32 Paul Gier a écrit :
> Hi Arnaud,
> 
> I should have some time today to try out the shared dependency tree API,
> if it doesn't work in Maven 3.0.4 with that, then I'm not sure what else
> I can do since this seems to be a regression in 3.0.4.  At that point I
> will just configure the failing ITs to be skipped for 3.0.4.
> 
> Jenkins also confirmed what I'm seeing locally, that all the ITs pass
> with 3.0.3:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.3/
> 
> All the dependency plugin ITs pass, however, the job shows failure
> because some of the invoker plugin its are failing in 3.0.3.
> 
> On 10/24/2012 08:28 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> > ok. thanks
> > I'll launch the release process tonight.
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Benson Margulies 
<[email protected]>wrote:
> >> I reran the build with a clean local repo and it's good. So I withdraw
> >> my complaint, go right ahead.
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]>
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >>> Strange your issue with the report.
> >>> I don't have it on my side.
> >> 
> >>> Example :
> >> https://projects.exoplatform.org/forum/forum-component/forum-component-co
> >> mmon/dependency-analysis.html>> 
> >>> I need to investigate more but it won't be before tonight
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]
> >>> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Benson Margulies <
> >> 
> >> [email protected]>
> >> 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]
> >>>> 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Ok if we are all agree I'll process the release this evening.
> >>>>>> Thanks for your help guys
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I am -1 to a release which does not work, at all, on Maven 3.0.4. I
> >>>>> tested the 'report' mojo last night with the current snapshot and it
> >>>>> died with the same wierd classworlds error that the ITs die with. I'm
> >>>>> willing to help fix this up, but I;m not following the logic of a
> >>>>> release. Feel free to explain why I'm confused.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'll do more diagnosis later today.
> >>>> 
> >>>>>> Arnaud
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <
> >> 
> >> [email protected]
> >> 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Le lundi 22 octobre 2012 17:38:10 Paul Gier a écrit :
> >>>>>>>> I did some more testing, and the tests only seem to fail using
> >> 
> >> Maven
> >> 
> >>>>>>>> 3.0.4 for me.  I was testing locally with Maven 3.0.3 previously.
> >>>>  
> >>>>  For
> >>>>  
> >>>>>>>> Robert, the ITs passed with Maven 2.2.1, but failed with 3.0.x.
> >>  
> >>  If
> >>  
> >>>> you
> >>>> 
> >>>>>>>> want to release this week it's probably ok to release even with
> >> 
> >> these
> >> 
> >>>>>>>> failures because the previous release didn't work at all with
> >> 
> >> Maven
> >> 
> >>>> 3.
> >>>> 
> >>>>>>>> We just didn't have ITs to catch it.  We could set the invoker
> >> 
> >> not to
> >> 
> >>>>>>>> execute those for Maven 3, and maybe put a note in the docs, and
> >>>> 
> >>>> find a
> >>>> 
> >>>>>>>> better fix for a 2.6.1 release.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> yes, this is not a regression but better ITs
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Hervé
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> -----
> >>>>>> Arnaud Héritier
> >>>>>> 06-89-76-64-24
> >>>>>> http://aheritier.net
> >>>>>> Mail/GTalk: [email protected]
> >>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >>>> 
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> -----
> >>> Arnaud Héritier
> >>> 06-89-76-64-24
> >>> http://aheritier.net
> >>> Mail/GTalk: [email protected]
> >>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to