Reading this doc some more, I'm really sad to read that the 'complex type' mechanism doesn't just use the type of the parameter declaration, but rather insists on mapping the element name to a type.
I don't suppose there's any chance that this doc is old news? Where does this code live, anyhow? On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Jesse Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> This is something that frustrates users no end: when a plugin has a >> parameter of complex type, and the doc does not elucidate the >> structure of the complex doc At All. > > +1024 > > -Jesse > > -- > There are 10 types of people in this world, those > that can read binary and those that can not. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
