OK, I'll plan on backporting, unless someone is really disturbed by switching to jsoup.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-07-05 17:49, Benson Margulies wrote: >> I just ran smack into a bug in wagon-maven-plugin which is really a >> bug in wagon-http-lightweight which is really a bug in >> wagon-http-shared4 which is really a bug in cyberneko. >> >> I can fix this by upgrading the later to use jsoup instead of cyberneko. >> >> Then what? It looks like all of the providers travel in a pack. If I >> stated a vote for the next version of the providers (would it be 2.0 >> or another beta???) would it be safe to release, or would we be frozen >> for fear of incompatibility? Should all these travel in a pack? > > They have historically all traveled in a pack, and I think they should > for the time being. > > Recent work by Mark Struberg switched the trunk of wagon from > 1.0-beta-8-SNAP to 2.0-SNAP. Before that a 1.x branch [1] was created, > which can be used for getting a patch release out. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/branches/wagon-1.x/ > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
