On 26/04/2010, at 3:08 AM, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > Author: hboutemy > Date: Sun Apr 25 17:08:01 2010 > New Revision: 937825 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937825&view=rev > Log: > removed maven-archetype-mojo since it is superceded by maven-archetype-plugin > > Removed: > maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/maven-archetype-mojo/ > Modified: > maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/pom.xml > > Modified: maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/pom.xml?rev=937825&r1=937824&r2=937825&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/pom.xml (original) > +++ maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles/pom.xml Sun Apr 25 17:08:01 > 2010 > @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ under the License. > <modules> > <module>maven-archetype-archetype</module> > <module>maven-archetype-j2ee-simple</module> > - <module>maven-archetype-mojo</module> > <module>maven-archetype-plugin</module> > <module>maven-archetype-plugin-site</module> > <module>maven-archetype-portlet</module>
I wonder if m-a-maven-plugin and m-a-maven-plugin-site might be more appropriate? I know they are long, but two maven-archetype-plugin's might be confusing? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
