2008/6/2, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Lukas Theussl wrote: > > > Hrm, ok. But if we release site and pir plugins (which is slated to happen > soonish, right?), these people will be bitten by the same problems anyway, > unless maven-2.0.10 gets released in the meantime and they upgrade > immediately. (And btw, shouldn't versions be specified even for snapshots > anyway?) > > > > Yes, people who don't specify a version will be automatically upgraded, > when the new releases come out shortly. (Yes, people should specify > versions!) > > There are two problems with putting out a next version SNAPSHOT before the > upcoming version is released. I already mentioned handling bug reports. The > other problem is that the first SNAPSHOT (2.0-beta-7-SNAPSHOT in this case) > will not get nearly as much real world testing as it should, because a lot > of users have already been automatically upgraded to the next SNAPSHOT > (2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT in this case). >
WDYT to add a classifier for plugins using doxia-beta-1? Cheers, Vincent > > > I just wanted to make it easy to test doxia-beta-1, but if this causes > confusion, I don't care to remove it (can I just remove a snapshot from the > repo?). > > > > It should be possible to remove the jars, but I suspect one also needs to > manually adjust the metadata files. I think the sync time for removing is > longer than it is for adding. > > In cases like this a deploy:undeploy goal would be handy for SNAPSHOT > artifacts. > > > > > > -Lukas > > > > > > Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > > > > Lukas Theussl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have uploaded the new snapshots with changed version number exactly > because I didn't want to interrupt the release process for > site-plugin-2.0-beta-7 and pir-2.1. How come people are already getting > these snapshots, I thought they'd have to explicitly ask for them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > If they don't specify a version and have opted to use our snapshot repo, > they will get the latest SNAPSHOT. In this case 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT and > 2.2-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > The only way for them to get 2.0-beta-7-SNAPSHOT and 2.1-SNAPSHOT now is > to explicitly specify those version in their POMs. > > > > > > > > > > -Lukas > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian E. Fox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't follow what you're asking > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June > 02, 2008 2:32 PM > > > > > To: Maven Developers List > > > > > Subject: Multiple concurrent SNAPSHOTs for MSITE and MPIR isn't > working > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > Having two concurrent SNAPSHOT versions for maven-site-plugin and > maven-project-info-reports-plugin just isn't working. > Issues are starting to pour in for the the newest SNAPSHOTs, when we are in > the process of releasing the older SNAPSHOTs. > > > > > > > > > > Can we please remove the 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT and 2.2-SNAPSHOT > respectively until 2.0-beta-7 and 2.1 has been released? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
