dfabulich wrote: > > Inter-class dependencies are one of TestNG's fundamental features >
Use of this feature is optional. For my sake, call it an "abuse" of TestNG if I run that simple unit tests without inter-class dependencies ;-) dfabulich wrote: > > [...] but TestNG is meant to support functional/integration tests. > If I may requote the TestNG marketing slogan, again: > TestNG is designed to cover all categories of tests: *unit*, [...] TestNG is not designed only for the fancy tests, it can run the simple unit tests, too. Dan, to me it looks you/Surefire are pushing something like "If you want unit tests, use JUnit, if you want function/integration tests, use TestNG" by punishing those that employ TestNG for the simple use-case. I am neither a JUnit nor TestNG fanatic but I can't follow your XOR-like argument here. Benjamin Bentmann -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Test-Suites%2C-Ant%2C-Surefire%2C-and-JunitReport-tp15076378p15136338.html Sent from the Surefire - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
