John Casey pisze: > While #3 might have the best performance in terms of speed, I really > wonder about memory performance. Leaving all those old antrun plugin > instances laying around but still reachable means that in very large > projects that use antrun, we'll have some pretty significant memory > problems. If you determine that the plugin+dependencies doesn't fit > the current requirement, then what's the point in keeping it around? We can use LRU cache if we afraid of memory.
The running times are: 12 secunds with -X option for the "integration-test" with current "error" 15 secunds with -X option for the removing not matching (pluginDescriptor) and putting new one into the cache 17 secunds with -X option without cashing commented Thanks, Piotr --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
