On 4/27/07, Jerome Lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/27/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/27/07, Jerome Lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes its buggy. See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-31
> > >
> > > I want to attach a batch file to the issue to test the problem. Would
> > > you mind help out ?
> > >
> > > I will attach it in a few hours. Then we can fix my proposed patch
> > > because it is not complete.
>
> Having looked at that issue Carlos indicates that he had a complete
> test suite for this.
>
> Have you found that?
No I saw his answer when I pointed it to you. But he said 'had' so I
wonder why it isn't there anymore. I will look into that (if you
don't) but not today.
Note I already wrote the batch script I talked about, I just forgot to
attach it. It's on another PC, so it will have to wait for some
hours.
This is a regression of http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-161
(i don't have comment rights *grr*)
revision 5960 broke the windows tests.
I haven't looked at which bits of code need fixing too yet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
