2007/4/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, I don't quite understand this? Are you saying it's just incompatible with what's in there already, or this now diverges from compatibility with the current version?
Nope I had incompatibility between my first descriptor proposition and my second. It is solved for now. i had made a branch in the code not in the SCM.
Raphaël
I think it was the former, in which case you shouldn't need to do anything - you can use the revision number to go back to, but since it's not in use yet it's ok to make those breaking changes. Hope I got that right. - Brett On 17/04/2007, at 8:51 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > Hi, > > With the archetypeng stuff, i think i have reached > a point in which i need advice. > > For what i can see, the current code seems useable. > > I am currently refactoring the proposed descriptor. > This change will be incompatible with the current > proposition, which mimics and enchance the > actual behaviour. > > I think i need to reprensent this changing in the SCM, > but i can't figure the right way: > > a) create a branch in the mojo repository (but the current code is in > the sandbox) > b) tag by hand a 0.1-alpha-1 version (with lazy concensus vote) and > stay in the sandbox > c) use the release plugin to release as version (idem vote) and stay > in the sandbox > > I dislike c, and have a light preference for b. > > Thanks in advance for any answer. > > Regards, > > Raphaël --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
