with maven-app-configuration released I thought we were well on our way to getting a release of continuum cut, but Emmanuel pointed out that I had missing the latest SNAPSHOT of the maven release stuff.
Does anyone have an issues with my resolving the maven-release version to the latest timestamped snapshot version and cutting the release with that? jesse On 3/21/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All outstanding jira tickets that were under 1.1-alpha-1 have been resolved... I am going to put together the dependencies that need to be released and get those on track for release now and then we can stage and call a vote on the first alpha of continuum 1.1 jesse On 3/20/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 20/03/2007, at 6:45 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: > > > ok, I am changing my tune on the remaining 11 issues, I want this > > thing released asap so we have something concrete to get moving on. > > The 11 issues are functionally no real different then a lot of the > > ones in the -2 jira so I am thinking we just push that forward and get > > going on this. > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > so, I haven't actually pulled a release on something like this at > > apache, from what I understand we can put this someplace for > > downloading that doesn't have to get mirrored all over the place. > > more information please brett... > > We have, in the past, deployed alphas to the regular deployment > location. > > > > > Should we vote on this? I think we have an implict consent based on > > just this thread from committers but should this alpha cycle take a > > vote each push, or can we vote on a biweekly release schedule for > > alphas for the next month or two? > > Yes, if it's a release we should vote on it. > > > > > if we get this decided I'll arrange the dependencies and get this > > thing alpha release dealio running asap. > > Cool > > - Brett > -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
