On 3/29/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see how we can maintain the behavior of the buggy implementation from 2.1.
+1 Honestly if found it silly to maintain a buggy behavior. Stéphane
-john On 3/29/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Max Bowsher wrote on Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:26 PM: > > > Jörg Schaible wrote: > [snip] > >> Note: Integer.decode(String) is not used here because it will not > >> handle negative hex-coded integer values. With this approach you can > >> express -1 as 0xFFFFFFFF ... > > > > The whole point here is to maximize compatibility with > > maven-assembly-plugin-2.1 behaviour. That's why we, not Java, > > should be > > making the decision. > > > > Furthermore, we are talking about Unix permission mode bits. Neither > > negative values, nor hexadecimal values, are relevant. Decimal values > > are only relevant to the extent of supporting existing assembly > > descriptors written for the buggy behaviour of > > maven-assembly-plugin-2.1. > > Yep. Noticed my misplaced comment when it was already sent. I would not > like to support hex code for Unix permissions either ... sorry, for the > noise. > > - Jörg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
