Should we file a 2.0.6 defect for this and link it to PLX-287?
Technically something needs to happen in Maven for this to get fixed (ie
update the pom)

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 1:06 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Working toward 2.0.6

This is now fixed in the latest plexus, which is being used in 2.1-
SNAPSHOT.
We are currently trying to figure if it is feasible to update the 2.0.x
branch at this time.

Andy

On 16 Feb 2007, at 16:30, Brian E. Fox wrote:

> Since this is a plexus issue, I might be grasping, but we are still 
> struggling with PLX-287. I haven't been able to produce a test set 
> because it seems to only occur in very large complicated build.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:55 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Working toward 2.0.6
>
> Hi,
>
> So that no one can accuse of resting on our laurels time to start 
> planning for 2.0.6. Not sure what the best way is to gather the issues

> to work on but it would be nice to gather them in the next week or so,

> and then work the next three weeks to resolve them and do another 
> release in 4 weeks.
>
> We can try the voting thing like we do with the plugins, or people can

> bring up issues and it's first come first serve. You can pick from
> here:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
> reset=true&&pid=10500&resolution=-1&fixfor=13141&sorter/
> field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>
> Or if you know that an issue has been the wrong fix version tell us.
>
> Project with full test cases that can be easily absorbed will be taken

> before anything else anything else. If these are for fixes and you 
> have unit tests that's great, or if you prefer to create an 
> integration test then to make this easier I have created a self- 
> contained, fully working of example of our integration tests:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/
> core-integration-test-sample
>
> or
>
> http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven-integration-tests/core-
> integration-test-sample.zip
>
> Anyone who produces an integration using this form I guarantee your 
> patches will go to the front of the line. I know that many people 
> contribute time to fix things and are frustrated when we don't apply 
> patches, but it also very frustrating for us to try and piece together

> comments and bits of code cobbled together in JIRA. I'm hoping that 
> this will help. Our integration testing strategy is not fully fleshed 
> out but what's in that example is what we are using today and them 
> being all the same as we can move them all forward together when we 
> improve it.
>
> Even for issue where you don't have a solution providing a test where 
> we can at least accurately reproduce the problem is immensely helpful.

> I will make an archetype of this example but I wanted to get this mail

> out to get the ball rolling for 2.0.6 so you can take the svn checkout

> or the zip.
>
> I have not forgotten about poor MNG-1577 :-)
>
> Jason.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to