I just created an account and the list is also empty :-(
Arnaud On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
was just pondering that myself. shouldn't the default be that guest is a user on all project groups and we remove it to be more restrictive? - Brett On 18/01/2007, at 8:05 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Is it normal that the projects list is empty when we aren't logon ? > > http://maven.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/groupSummary.action > > Arnaud > > On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ok, fair enough. I've left it on, and made it use a different local >> repository. >> >> I'd say once we release Continuum 1.1 and are happy it is stable >> enough to use, we can turn this off. >> >> On 15/01/2007, at 11:02 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: >> >> > Brett Porter wrote: >> >> so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :) >> > >> > No, I'm saying it's there to verify the dog food. If there is no >> > discrepancies between what the cron is saying and the C instance is >> > saying, it's good. If there is an discrepancy it's not good. >> > >> > It will be more a tool to verification tool that a CI (but that >> > might be two sides of the same story :) >> > >> > -- >> > Trygve >> > >> >> The only thing it tests differently is: >> >> - works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something >> >> else (which is something we should work on fixing if it does, >> >> rather than rely on ci.sh) >> >> - runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build execution >> >> in continuum too, though). >> >> So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt? >> >> - Brett >> >> On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: >> >>> Brett Porter wrote: >> >>>> Folks, >> >>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use >> >>>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections? >> >>> >> >>> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the >> >>> automatic notifications can be turned off or just send failures. >> >>> That way it would verify the product (it will in itself be an >> >>> integration test) because if the Continuum instance says that >> >>> something is failing, you should expect an email saying the same >> >>> right after. Or at least you can check the logs directory if >> >>> you're suspecting some other failure. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Trygve >>
