so you agree with me ;)
seriously, the only reason to allow users without passwords would be
to show a customized page, and we don't have that
On 12/26/06, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
windows? :)
On 12/26/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why they can give permissions to the guest user.
> I haven't seen any app that allows empty passwords for users.
>
> On 12/26/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 26 Dec 06, at 10:58 AM 26 Dec 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
> >
> > > imo, yes :)
> > >
> > > only the administrator has the ability to make those decisions and
> > > they ought to be allowed to do it...
> > >
> >
> > Definitely, as it might be used in a small group, in an already
> > secure environment. Assume the driver has a brain.
> >
> > Jason.
> >
> > > we restrict it already that users are not by default allowed to make
> > > empty passwords but with a but of configuration they should be allowed
> > > to not have passwords, if that is the admin's desire.
> > >
> > > also, admins can make passwords that don't follow the password
> > > conventions, but by default they are setup to be forced to make a
> > > password that does conform on first login
> > >
> > > jesse
> > >
> > > On 12/26/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> In 1.1-SNAPSHOT, on 'Create New User', I can create an account
> > >> with no
> > >> password, even though the two password fields have asterisks
> > >> displayed
> > >> next to them.
> > >>
> > >> If I then edit the user and uncheck the 'Change Password Next Login'
> > >> box, the user can log in without a password.
> > >>
> > >> Should this be possible?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Wendy
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > jesse mcconnell
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
jesse mcconnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
