On 23/12/2006, at 1:34 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
That was my point in my last email. I understand why we need that "old key" table but this would be something that will just get bloated over time. There could be a 'housekeeper' process that can clean up old keys after a certain time has expired. I don't see a reason why we need to keep the old stuff for long.
Continuum itself is probably not that worried about old links needing to work, but its nice if they can. I would hope that foks don't rename their projects *that* often - but is it really likely to be a problem if we do it? Anyway, still thinking of that as a next step, not part of the initial impl.
