On 14/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
- Using an installation layout that is consistent with our current
setup
I think what you are actually asking for is one that is consistent
with our documented setup. I think it's still possible to relocate
the binaries since the only thing we should document is the /conf/
files.
That said, it would be much simpler to just bundle it as it is, so
I'd request that Fedora consider doing so as Jason has said.
- Maven running with a standard JDK and not being compiled with GJC
or anything weird like that. With Java being GPL now that shouldn't
be a problem
This isn't possible. Java 7 is GPLd, not 5 and not 6.
I'd amend it to be that it must be possible to run it with an
installed alternate JDK, but I expect that it would by default have
to use gcj. It should be well tested with gcj by Fedora before
distributing because I know we sure haven't tested it on there.
- How far into the graph do you need to build from sources
- Would a self-contained Maven repository with the binary
dependencies work and then build Maven itself from source or do you
want to walk back down the entire graph?
- Are you guys willing to compromise and make something that uses
our current layout. I think we could live with some symlinks to /
usr/bin or whatever
Yes, I think these are the next things to answer.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
