Hi,
On 21.07.25 08:04, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
Hi,
For me AssertJ is more powerful than standard JUnit Assertions.
Assertions with AssertJ are also very good readable for me in code.
So as it is a test dependency I don't have any problem using it.
Project is very well maintained and has an acceptable license.
One thing I would like to see is do not mix assertions framework in
one test class - when we use AssertJ use it everywhere in one test
class.
I second that.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 at 06:51, Giovanni van der Schelde
<gvdsche...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
In a recent PR review, the use of AssertJ assertions was raised as a point
of discussion.
To avoid recurring debates and ensure the PR is reviewed for the changes
it provides, I’d like to propose that we clarify the goal regarding this,
and perhaps other, dependencies.
Specifically, should we:
- Remove the AssertJ dependency entirely to prevent its use?
- State that we support the dependency and accept its use in our tests?
Having a clear stance on this would help streamline code reviews and avoid
repeated discussions on future PRs.
Perhaps there are already some guidelines on this which I'm unaware of, so
I'm looking forward to your input.
Regards,
Giovanni van der Schelde
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
