sounds good to integrate it, also happy if it hits maven 3 at some point

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
<https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old
Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>


Le mar. 22 juil. 2025 à 11:23, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a
écrit :

> Howdy,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion about ingesting some Maveniverse "skunk
> works" projects into Maven project, as they seems utterly useful and wanted
> (and are proven):
>
> Mimir - is currently an extension and provides global cache (solves same
> problem as split repository, but is not as invasive and is hence, fully
> compatible even in Maven3 land). It can be made part of resolver and could
> be always present (and configurable). The LAN cache publishing should be
> omitted, as it is really a niche feature, and can be built atop of it.
>
> Njord - suite of extension and plugin, solving the problem of publishing,
> among others publishing to Maven Central Portal but also local staging.
> This one cannot be made "resolver only", we need to tinker how to do it
> (simplest: keep it current form next to existing extensions like build
> cache is). Part of it could be made Resolver only, like local staging is
> and publishing can be built atop of it.
>
> Heimdall - an extension improving Resolvers built in Remote Repository
> Filtering, the code should be really just applied onto Resolver existing
> RRF classes. Hence, this can directly improve Resolver and be part of it.
>
> -----
>
> IMO, these should go into Resolver2/Maven4 and offer OOTB experience, while
> Maven3 users could still use Maveniverse or any other existing tools.
> Basically the goal would be to enhance Maven4 capabilities but not leave
> Maven3 users abandoned either, and have them hopping from 3 to 4 to deal
> with known functionalities (coming from extension in former, or from core
> in latter).
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> T
>

Reply via email to