On 2025/02/12 18:59:19 Matthias Bünger wrote:
> Hi all,
> some months ago, we noticed that the regular build of the Maven PDF
> plugin broke, because the plugin is not compatible to Doxia 2.0.0 (also
> see MPDF-112).
> The question raised, if we should retrie the PDF plugin.
> 
> Some information:
> Last version, 1.6.1, was released in August 2022. However almost all PR
> of this plugin since 2020 were dependency updates brought up by
> dependabot. So you could argue that the plugin is somehow "dead".
> 
> Monthly downloads of ALL versions were around 43.000 over the last year,
> with a peak in October and November reaching 57.000 downloads. However
> since December it crashed down to 17.000 downloads according to central
> stats.
> If we look at the last version, the monthly downloads raised from 19.000
> in February 2024 to a peak of 33.500 in October. Since December they are
> down to 11.000 downloads per month, which are roughly 65% of all
> downloads of the plugin.
> 
> As a comparison: The total number of downloads of the Maven compiler
> plugin (which ofc is a core plugin) is almost 32,5 million per months
> (almost 42 million in October 2024, but the mentioned "crash" in
> December is noticeable throughout all plugins.
> 
> --------
> So I want to start the discussion by asking: Who is using the pdf
> plugin? Did you switch to other tools for generating documentation (for
> example ASCII Doc [plugin])? What do you think about archiving the PDF
> plugin?
> 
> What do you think?

With Doxia 2.0.0, consider it dead. The FO part is poorely configured is still 
uses Type 1 fonts. Unicode is a severe problem which was never addressed. All 
of this is solveable with FO, but no one will allocate resources.

Start a vote for archiving.

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to