Hi Anders, Not sure it can really be problematic until it is considered as sources - and it is not. But 100% agree it can be neat to keep it at some point but then it means flagging them as "keepable" to not keep the comment on build block which will be stripped for example.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Le dim. 9 févr. 2025 à 20:30, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> a écrit : > Hi, > > I and Robert did a Maven 4 presentation at Jfokus here in Sweden earlier > this week. One of the main topics was of course build/consumer POM. > After the talk we were approached by a couple of people from the audience > who raised concern about comments in the build POM being removed in the > published consumer POM. They thought that could be problematic for larger > corporations who want, for example, copyright comments. > > Any thoughts on this? > > /Anders >
