I thought you were referring to having a small language in the property activation...
Le mer. 20 mars 2024 à 22:06, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > I just opted to solve potentially several feature requests with a single > code change rather than addressing each one separately with similar code > repeated in e.g. every profile activator implementation. > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:57 PM gnodet (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > gnodet commented on PR #1446: > > URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1446#issuecomment-2010621686 > > > > > That was what I originally considered, but I quickly came to the > > opinion that as soon as we did it that way, someone would want to use some > > such property to match a Java version, etc., and that this would be a > > generally applicable way to solve a broad cross section of similar use > > cases. > > > > How could that be considered a bad thing ? > > > > > > -- > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > > us...@infra.apache.org > > > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
