+1 to fix it before any > alpha release but also agree it is fine to let the alpha-1 go out while it is explicitly mentionned as known and under work.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 14:13, Michael Osipov <[email protected]> a écrit : > Am 2021-07-01 um 11:19 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > > I've been running a few tests to measure performances. > > This simplistic test looks like running the following command in a loop > and > > measure the execution time. This is done on a quite big project so that > a > > bunch of pom files are actually read. > > > > for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ; do time $MAVEN_HOME/bin/mvn -DskipTests > > -Dmaven.experimental.buildconsumer=true help:evaluate > > -Dexpression=java.io.tmpdir -DforceStdout -q ; done > > > > The average results are the following: > > Maven 4 with build/consumer: 28,40s > > Maven 4 w/out build/consumer: 23,43s > > Maven 3: 21,54s > > Kindly try also with -Daether.syncContext.named.factory=nolock > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
