I was triggered by some failing unit tests, which should have been solved in maven-javadoc-plugin-3.0.0

My last commit according to GIT was november 18th
My last commit according to SVN was december 3rd

comparing svnlog with gitlog most of these commits are lost:

moved to git
----
[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
----
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release maven-javadoc-plugin-3.0.0
----
[MJAVADOC-498] "module not found" when Java 9 module-info present
Support aggrated javadoc
----
Skip several unittests for Java9
----
JDK-8032205 was closed as not an issue, so not solved in Java9.
Need to review the conclusion
----
Upgrade mockito to remove warning about illegal reflective access
----
Improve TestJavadocReportTest#testTestJavadoc
J8 warns and continues with missing dependency, J9 fails.
In fact test was wrong: dependency should have been on classpath
----
unittest should prefer JAVA_HOME when executing from cmdline
When running with Java9+ no need to switch from jre to jdk directory (jep220)
----
MJAVADOC-502 Update DEFAULT_JAVA_API_LINKS
----
session is required parameter, so cannot be null. Fix related unittests
----
Add project/artifact key to set of sourcePaths to recognize reactor projects versus dependencies
----
Group sets of sourcepaths per project, in prepare of usage of module-source-path.
----
Switch from List to Collection to make it easier to use Sets when preferred
----
[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
----
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release maven-javadoc-plugin-3.0.0
----




On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:53:23 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote:

looking at commits@ content https://lists.apache.org/list.html?
[email protected] with subject containing "maven/plugins/trunk"

and plugins svn2git mirror https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/commits/
trunk

only 1 commit is missing: my latest commit on maven-site-plugin
(the last commit for Git migration is not useful)


Same on shared showed no missing commit.


what latest commit of maven-javadoc-plugin are you looking for?

Regards,

Hervé

Le samedi 16 décembre 2017, 11:56:31 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
For everybody just a warning I faced today:
If you switch to the git repos, please make sure all commits are migrated.
I noticed the latest commits of the maven-javadoc-plugin got lost.

thanks,
Robert

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:06:09 +0100, Stephen Connolly

<[email protected]> wrote:
> I see we have a large number of repos now on gitbox ;-)
>
> On Thu 7 Dec 2017 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: >> ok, I didn't update my repo clone: now the run-its profile is activated
>>
>> then the plan should just confirm "it works!" :)
>>
>> and find which jobs are special, like maven-dist-tool (which has to be
>> scheduled daily instead of code change, and one platform only)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mercredi 6 décembre 2017, 23:58:45 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit :
>> > On Wed 6 Dec 2017 at 22:38, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]>
>>
>> wrote:
>> > > Now that we have 2 ASF Organization Jenkins jobs (one for gitbox [1]
>>
>> and
>>
>> > > one
>> > > for git-wip: thank you Stephen) and that it looks quite successful,
>>
>> let's
>>
>> > > plan
>> > > the next steps.
>> > >
>> > > Here is what I see:
>> > > 1. removal of hand-defined Jenkins jobs that are now duplicates
>> > >
>> > > 2. preparation of the 60 new empty git repos for shared & plugins
>> > >
>> > > 3. migration of the 1 shared component and 1 plugin using
>>
>> migrate-*.sh
>>
>> > > scripts
>> > > [3] to test and eventually rework the Jenkinsfile (I suppose it will
>> > > require
>> > > some little change, to run add "run-its" profile)
>> >
>> > As far as I recall, I added -P+run-its already
>> >
>> > For the plugin, I'd like to do the job for maven-site-plugin, since we
>> >
>> > > expect
>> > > to release it soon.
>> > > For the shared component, I don't know if there is a best candidate
>> > >
>> > > 4. once previous step is ok, do the full migration: if there are
>> > > volunteers
>> > > for helping, that would be great, since populating 60 git repos
>>
>> won't
>> be
>>
>> > > really fun...
>> > >
>> > > And as part of 60 empty git repos creation, I propose to migrate the
>> > > "Google
>> > > repo manifest" maven-aggregator [4] to ASF: my personal use has been
>>
>> quite
>>
>> > > successful, I hope it's the same for others. Perhaps there are
>>
>> better
>>
>> > > ideas
>> > > for its name: maven-aggregator
>> > >
>> > > Any other idea? any objection?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Hervé
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/
>> > >
>> > > [2] https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wip/
>> > >
>> > > [3] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scripts/git/
>> > >
>> > > [4] https://github.com/hboutemy/maven-aggregator
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > --
>> >
>> > Sent from my phone
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>> --
>
> Sent from my phone

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to