ok, done http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-April/040332.html
re-reading Uwe's thread: it was about a change un resource URLs (addition of #resource) that severely broke a lot of tools, not really if MR JARs worked or not Regards, Hervé Le lundi 18 avril 2016 08:54:15 Rory O'Donnell a écrit : > Hi Hervé , > > I think the best place to discuss is on the > core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net mailing list. > Uwe Schindler had started a discussion there [1], I thought that issue > was resolved in b109. > > I suggest starting a discussion on core-libs. > > Rgds,Rory > > > [1] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-March/039303.html > > On 17/04/2016 16:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Hi Rory, > > > > I have an issue with Multi Release JARs that I won't call a show stopper, > > but I'd like to know what happens. > > > > I upgraded our Maven multi-release demo [1] to build with JDK 9, then I > > added tests that run the resulting jar with JRE 7, 8 and 9. And there is > > no runtime that is picking newer classes, even JDK 9 Jigsaw build 113 > > > > I saw there was a discussion in march for build 108, but I could not > > figure > > out what's the next step: is the feature removed? temporarily or > > permanently? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > [1] https://github.com/hboutemy/maven-jep238 > > > > Le vendredi 15 avril 2016 09:55:04 Rory O'Donnell a écrit : > >> Hi Robert & Kristian, > >> > >> Early Access b113 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/> for JDK 9 is > >> available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here > >> <http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/changes/jdk-9+113.html>. > >> > >> Early Access b113 <https://jdk9.java.net/jigsaw/> (#4664) for JDK 9 with > >> Project Jigsaw is available on java.net. > >> > >> * The important change in this build is that root modules when > >> > >> compiling code in the unnamed module, or when running and the main > >> class is loaded from the class path, do not include the EE modules. > >> More on this in JEP 261. > >> > >> * The other change in this build is that the -Xpatch option is now > >> > >> aligned with what we have documented in JEP 261, support for the old > >> form has been removed. > >> > >> We are very interested in hearing your experiences in testing any Early > >> Access builds. Have you have begun testing against > >> JDK 9 and or JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw EA builds, have you uncovered > >> showstopper issues that you would like to discuss? > >> We would really like to hear your findings so far, either reply to me or > >> via the mailing lists [1], [2]. > >> > >> Rgds,Rory > >> > >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/ > >> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
