Le dimanche 21 décembre 2014 21:30:49 Mirko Friedenhagen a écrit :
> Hello Benson,
> 
> we work around the distributionManagement issue for our in-house
> projects by defining a property which is picked up from Maven
> settings.xml in our department parent pom.
I suppose this works well for repository or snapshotRepository, ie what's 
absolutely necessary

But for site, there is a strong issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-604
and fixing it isn't trivial...
do you use such property with site too?

> 
> My question here: if you do not define distributionManagement (via a
> property) in a pom, all users of Maven would have to fiddle around
> with their settings to deploy anything.
> 
> 
> Regards Mirko
> --
> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen)
> https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
> 
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> > I'd like to submit the concept that distributionManagement has
> > something in common with repositories. Here's the common event that
> > leads me to think about this:
> > 
> > 1. Find a useful open source component.
> > 2. Discover that it has a missing feature or a bug(let) that gets in
> > the way of what I want to do.
> > 3. Submit to owner, meanwhile ...
> > 4. Want to make release into my own infrastructure of fork while
> > waiting a long time for owner to absorb and release.
> > 
> > Step 4 has always felt to me like much too much work. If it's entirely
> > my infrastructure, I need to diddle with scm, distributionManagement,
> > url, and version. If I am actually making a public fork, then I've got
> > the groupId (and perhaps the package) to deal with. This case,
> > however, is outside of the scope of this message.
> > 
> > I've mulled over a maven-fork-plugin that would pom-edit for this
> > purpose, but I've also wondered about the subject line of this
> > message: should _all_ the information that concerns 'extrinsic'
> > infrastructure be factored in some way that makes all this trivial?
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to