Am 2014-10-29 um 03:24 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
we currently propose 3 versions: 3.0.5, 3.1.1 and 3.2.3
which suppose we may release 3.0.6, 3.1.2 and 3.2.4 in the future
I see why we would release 3.0.6: Aether change force some users to stay to
3.0.x, and I started to define some backports I'd like to put in it [1]
But I don't see why we would release 3.1.2: AFAIK, there is no outstanding
change in 3.2.x that blocks 3.1.x users from upgrading to 3.2.x, isn't it?
Then IMHO, we should remove 3.1.1 from top download links, and only propose
3.0.5 and 3.2.3
This wouldn't only make our roadmap easier to understand
Any objection?
While this sounds like a good idea, I am strongly opposed by changing
the JDK version or fundemental dependencies (e.g. Aether) in patch
versions. This is unexpected behavior.
If you have necessary patches for bugs to deliver, do it. But don't EOL
3.1 if you want to upgrade (!) 3.0.x.
But yes, if we do not intend to roll 3.1.2, we should send it to end of
life officially.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
