Hi all, these are my first comments, after I had a quick look into the draft [1]:
* LDP declares dct:modified and dct:creator as (optionally) server-controlled (managed) properties. The dct-vocabulary is wide-spread and used in many applications, declaring it managed will break many of them. There is a ldp-vocabulary, why not use ldp:modified / ldp:creator for this purpose? [Section 4.4] * for paging (cool feature!), LDP defines links to the next page using ldp:nextPage (and a corresponding HTTP Link-Header) to indicate the URI of the next page. Is there a reason not to also include the links ldp:prevPage, ldp:firstPage, ldp:lastPage? [Section 4.9] * for a non-LDPR POSTed to the LDP server, the server may create a corresponding LDPR. The non-LDPR may Link (HTTP-Header) to it's associated LDPR using the "meta"-relation - why not add the also an inverse Link (HTTP Header) using e.g. the "content"-relation? [Section 5.4] * my general impression is that in several places (especially with paging [Section 4.9] and inlining [Sections 4.10 and 5.10]) server responses mix data and request-specific meta-data (e.g. navigation links with paging, etc...). I have no alternative proposal but still this feels somehow "soiled" (sorry, did not find a better wording). Probably these issues were discussed lengthily in the WG, maybe someone more involved there can share some insights? Best Jakob [1] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html On 17 July 2013 16:20, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nandana, > > > On 17/07/13 16:13, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: >> >> As of this week's telecon [1], LDP WG is planning to go for the last call >> on 7/22 and there are some significant changes in the spec after F2F3. >> This >> week is for the WG members to do their final reviews. It might be a good >> time for Marmotta devs to have a look at the spec draft [2] and see how it >> fits Marmotta. > > > I created MARMOTTA-272 exactly with that purpose. My problem in last weeks > is the time. But for sure we should provide feedback to the spec as a > project. > > If you want, we can collect there the notes, trying to provide proper > feedback. > > Cheers, > > -- > Sergio Fernández
