+1 we'll spin another round for an IRC-meeting for the release-planning in September.
Best Jakob On 17 July 2013 09:00, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess would be better to delay this until September when all will be back > from holidays... what do you think? > I the meantime, continue working as normal. > > > On 12/07/13 20:57, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> not so many people have voted in the doodle... >> http://doodle.com/tbxe8aikq7sg7yf6 >> for the moment Monday at 9 or 10 (UTC) looks to be the most popular >> option, but three of us is not enough to clearly say so >> would be great to meet and discuss about the following release >> otherwise I guess we should think about delay it until being back of >> vacations in September... >> >> On 03/07/13 17:51, Jakob Frank wrote: >>> >>> What about having an IRC-meeting to go through the issues and decide what >>> should go into 3.1 and what could be moved to 3.2. >>> >>> We have developers in quite different timezones (UTC+1, UTC+2 and UTC+10 >>> are the ones I know about) - so it might be not so easy to find a common >>> time-slot but we should try: >>> >>> So please pick your preferred time slots for an IRC meeting (all times in >>> UTC!): >>> http://doodle.com/tbxe8aikq7sg7yf6 >>> >>> Best, >>> Jakob >>> >>> On 3 July 2013 12:46, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> yesterday Jakob and me we were talking about the possibility to plan the >>>> next release by the end of July 2013. I think we have made an important >>>> progress in many parts of the project, but we should try to reflect >>>> those >>>> things as releases. >>>> >>>> Taking a quick look into our issue tracker: >>>> >>>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>> >>>> >>>> Currently there are 55 issues planner for that version. For me it's >>>> quite >>>> clear that we would need to prioritize some of them, and shift some to >>> >>> 3.2. >>>> >>>> So I think all current assignees should decide what to do with their >>> >>> issues >>>> >>>> by 3.1.0, trying to balance priority and the time they would have to >>>> take >>>> care of those issue. >>>> >>>> What do you think? Would be feasible? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sergio Fernández >>> >>> >> > > -- > Sergio Fernández
