[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14041050#comment-14041050
]
John Gibson edited comment on SOLR-6193 at 6/23/14 6:23 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Here's a patch for an existing unit test on the lucene_solr_4_8 branch that
illustrates the issue.
Also note that while working on this I noticed that the facet.limit local
parameter is ignored for both the regular and distributed versions of the
search. Is that intentional? Or a bug?
was (Author: jgibson):
Here's a patch for an existing unit test that illustrates the issue.
Also note that while working on this I noticed that the facet.limit local
parameter is ignored for both the regular and distributed versions of the
search. Is that intentional? Or a bug?
> Distributed search with multiselect faceting ignores the facet.offset local
> parameter
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6193
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SolrCloud
> Affects Versions: 4.8.1
> Environment: OS X 10.9.3 Apache Tomcat 7.0.41
> Debian Apache Tomcat 7
> Reporter: John Gibson
> Attachments: bad_facet_offset_test_4_8_x.patch
>
>
> When a distributed search contains multiselect faceting the per-field
> faceting options are not honored for alternate selections of the field. For
> example with a query like:
> {noformat}
> facet.field=blah&facet.field={!key myblah
> facet.offset=10}blah&f.blah.facet.offset=20
> {noformat}
> The returned facet results for both blah and myblah will use an offset of 20
> as opposed to a standard search returning myblah with an offset of 10.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
