You *are* reviewing the source ZIP Jan will deliver at the end of the release. See the `unzip` command in the review kit – for Windows, see `Expand-Archive` command in the shared `verify-release.ps1` script.
If I misunderstood your remark, would you mind elaborating it, please? On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:06 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The review kit is not quite right IMO: One must at least review the > source zip or tar ball. Reviewing a checkout of the sources is useful > for devs but that's not what we deliver from my understanding of > Apache rules; we deliver source files (not an svn repo). > Would it be possible to add to the review kit to make this distinction? > > TY, > Gary > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:08 PM Jan Friedrich <freeand...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 3.1.0. > > > > Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release-notes.html > > GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net > > Commit: 76eb4b34f501415fef5adcee2c677f60f48651dc > > Distribution: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net/3.1.0 > > Signing key: 0x7D24496A230E29D6349A99EF583E491578F02D5D > > Review kit: > https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release-review.html > > > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list. > > > > [ ] +1, release the artifacts > > [ ] -1, don't release, because ... > > > > This vote is open for 72 hours and will pass unless getting a net > > negative vote count. > > All votes are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but > > only the Logging Services PMC votes are officially counted. >
