Hey Piotr, [My answers are inline.]
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 1:10 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about `kubernetes`, `docker` and `jpa`. Are these omissions > intentional? > They can indeed be gone too. In the context of `kubernetes` and `docker`, similar to Matt, my experience has always been in the direction that these properties are exported to environment variables. For `jpa`, I don't have much experience, hence my reluctance. But if you'd ask me, we should get rid of that too. > Our employers are the Open Source equivalent of paying customers. If I > am not mistaken they allowed you to work on Log4j at one time or > another. > When Gary says "please don't drop..." I take it as a declaration that > he'll handle the issues filed against these modules (and he does do > it). > I think that is a slippery slope to base the decision of whether we shall keep a functionality or not. If my employer would be using `formatMsgNoLookups`, and I volunteer to maintain it even after Log4Shell, shall we still keep it around? We shouldn't keep a feature because somebody is paid to maintain it. It should make sense to distribute it with the official product. Though note that the paid maintainers can still develop that feature in a separate non-ASF GitHub repository.
