I'm ok either way, this is an alpha after all. Gary
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 15:16 Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: > I agree the OSGi metadata should be fixed for this release. > > > On Jun 16, 2023, at 1:41 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Ralph, > > > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 22:12, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> > >> This is a vote to release Log4j 3.0.0-alpha, the first release the > Log4j 3.x series. > >> > >> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > >> [] +1, release the artifacts > >> [] -1, don't release because... > > > > I am afraid I have to vote -1 on this one, because several modules > > have a wrong OSGI Fragment-Host value. > > > > It should be `org.apache.logging.log4j.core`, but it is: > > > > ./log4j-jdbc-dbcp2/pom.xml: > > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.db.jdbc</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-jpa/pom.xml: > > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.db.jpa</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-csv/pom.xml: > > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-jeromq/pom.xml: > > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-jms/pom.xml: > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.jms.appender</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-layout-jackson-json/pom.xml: > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.jackson.json</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-layout-jackson-xml/pom.xml: > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.jackson.xml</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-layout-jackson-yaml/pom.xml: > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.jackson.yaml</Fragment-Host> > > ./log4j-layout-jackson/pom.xml: > > <Fragment-Host>org.apache.logging.log4j.jackson</Fragment-Host> > > > > Piotr > >
