I don't think any of those are too common, so it probably doesn't make
sense to do all of those combinations.  The prefer_boost should be
effectively covered by the new build that compiles it in C++11 mode.

-Robert Middleton

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:43 PM Stephen Webb <swebb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There are 3(logchar type) x 4(charset type) x 2(unichar?) x 2(wchar_t?) x
> 2(prefer_boost?) x 2(qt_support?) =192 combinations of build options
> log4cxx provides of which only one is being tested.
>
> What should we do with those?
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:23 PM Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Upon further investigation, it appears as though it was the cache
> > functionality that broke. Updating from v2 to v3 seems to have fixed
> > the problem.  It looks like when you updated vcpkg to the latest
> > version that fixed it for one build, probably because the yml file
> > changed or something?
> >
> > Anyway, it's fixed now.  Are there any other configurations that we
> > should test for while I'm making updates?
> >
> > -Robert Middleton
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 1:37 AM Stephen Webb <swebb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It works using a more recent version of vcpkg - not sure what the issue
> > > with the old version is.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 1:41 PM Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been adding some more builds for log4cxx(to test more
> > > > combinations of features and stuff) but I seem to have broken the
> > > > windows build - cmake can't find APR with the .pc file.  It seems that
> > > > whatever we had before cached had the .pc files in it, but trying to
> > > > rebuild clean(no cache) does not have .pc files in it to find the
> > > > library.
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking that this may have had something to do with the recent
> > > > changes to how we find APR, but I'm not much of a Windows guy so it
> > > > could take me a while to figure out what exactly is broken.  I know
> > > > that Steven Webb uses vcpkg, would you be able to take a look at it
> > > > and figure out why it might be failing?
> > > >
> > > > The branch in question:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/tree/LOGCXX-562
> > > >
> > > > -Robert Middleton
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to