Does that imply you are going to finish porting the changes to master or are 
you expecting someone else to do it?

Ralph

> On Mar 21, 2022, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, master is behind. At some point, both master and release-2.x,
> especially master had build problems. When I could not build master I
> stopped porting changes which I had been doing all along for my 1.2 bridge
> changes. I just did not want to put in even more time into master when I
> had a lot left to do in release-2.x. So, that's how we got to where we are.
> 
> Gary
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 07:19 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote:
> 
>> Gary and Piotr put a great deal of effort into `log4j-1.2-api` in
>> `release-2.x`. So far we haven't heard of any major complaints but happy
>> migration stories. Great job! 💯
>> 
>> While trying to cherry-pick a one-liner from `release-2.x` to `master`
>> today, I have run into some issues. If I am not mistaken, `log4j-1.2-api`
>> lags behind quite a bit in `master` compared to `release-2.x`. Is this
>> intentional? If not, do we have any plans to sync the two?
>> 

Reply via email to