Does that imply you are going to finish porting the changes to master or are you expecting someone else to do it?
Ralph > On Mar 21, 2022, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, master is behind. At some point, both master and release-2.x, > especially master had build problems. When I could not build master I > stopped porting changes which I had been doing all along for my 1.2 bridge > changes. I just did not want to put in even more time into master when I > had a lot left to do in release-2.x. So, that's how we got to where we are. > > Gary > > Gary > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 07:19 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > >> Gary and Piotr put a great deal of effort into `log4j-1.2-api` in >> `release-2.x`. So far we haven't heard of any major complaints but happy >> migration stories. Great job! 💯 >> >> While trying to cherry-pick a one-liner from `release-2.x` to `master` >> today, I have run into some issues. If I am not mistaken, `log4j-1.2-api` >> lags behind quite a bit in `master` compared to `release-2.x`. Is this >> intentional? If not, do we have any plans to sync the two? >>