*[My answers are inline.]*

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:48 PM Raman Gupta <rocketra...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3116
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/543
>

Thanks! I will check these out momentarily.


> One administrative note -- as I am a committer (although thus far I have
> only committed to the log4j2 kotlin repo) should I do dev="rgupta" instead
> of adding myself in due-to?
>

Of course! Apologies that I have totally missed it.

Some technical notes -- some of the functionality could be more efficient
> with some changes to the resolvers, to avoid delegating so many of the
> fields to the pattern resolver. Specifically:
>
> 1) the level resolver could be enhanced with a label mapping function,
>

PatternLayout enhances individual resolvers. For instance, %level directive
accepts a boolean lowerCase argument. In JsonTemplateLayout, I want to
follow a different approach and rather than enhancing individual resolvers,
I want to introduce reusable components. For instance, I have recently
introduced the CaseConverter resolver. One can combine this with
LevelResolver to have the same effect with %level{lowerCase} in
PatternLayout. Coming back to your remark about LevelResolver, similarly,
rather than enhancing LevelResolver, I want to introduce a
SubstitutionResolver, if you know what I mean. Nevertheless, please go
ahead and create a ticket addressing your "problem". I can comment further
there on how to approach it.


> 2) the message resolver could optionally output stack trace as well, and
>

Again, similar to the aforementioned "reusable components" strategy, I was
thinking of creating a ConcatenationResolver. Would you mind creating a
ticket for this as well, please?


> 3) a serial number resolver could be added.
>

Do you mean as the one mentioned in LOG4J2-3067
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3067>?


> However, in my opinion we should commit the basic functionality first, and
> deal with those sorts of optimizations later.
>

Agreed! This said, let's create tickets for these feature requests so as
not to forget them.

Reply via email to