+1 If there is sufficient interest in patching older releases, there'd need to be an effort to backport other things.
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 08:29, Carter Kozak <cko...@ckozak.net> wrote: > > +1 > > I don't have a strong opinion either way about retaining download links. In > general I think keeping them around suggests that we're still willing to > support fixes on those branches, even if we document to the contrary. That > said, it's easy enough to close tickets against old versions by pointing out > the documentation. > > -Carter > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, at 02:04, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to announce Log4j 2 will no longer support Java 6 or Java 7. > > We will remove the download links for Log4j 2.3 and 2.12.1 from the web > > site and future release announcements. Of course, both will continue to be > > available from the distribution archives and Maven Central, and every prior > > version of the web site is still accessible at > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-{version}/index.html > > <http://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-%7Bversion%7D/index.html>. > > > > My +1 > > > > Ralph > >
