Well, I would love to know what you have in mind before we make a lot of changes. Using Maven to build the web site isn’t particularly fun but it does build a lot of the web site with very little effort.
Ralph > On Mar 9, 2021, at 4:49 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mar 9, 2021, at 2:35 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Also a while back we had a logo contest and from then on changed the >> logo with every release. All the logos might be in git somewhere... > > I believe I have all the previous logos and you probably do too. Look in > src/site/resources/logo. They are all pretty much the same except for using > different color schemes. All I did for each release was pick one and add the > release number to it. > > You can look at all the previous versions of the web site. For example > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-2.6/index.html and > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-2.8.1/index.html. > > > Ralph > > >> >> Gary >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:34 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The ASF has graphics people that Apache-fy logos and such, I think you >>> just need to email the marketing list. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:18 PM Volkan Yazıcı <volkan.yaz...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have been tinkering for a while chipping in €500 from my pocket to revamp >>>> Log4j logo and website. I personally think it will be really sad to >>>> announce Log4j 3 to the public with the current visuals. Log4j is by far >>>> the best Java logging framework out there in the wild – no, I am not biased >>>> at all ;P – though our website is far from reflecting that. Before asking >>>> for some cash from you people, I was wondering if ASF can help us out here; >>>> contribute financially, provide a designer, etc. Do you have any ideas? >>>> >>>> And... What do you think about the idea? >>>> >>>> P.S. I am very well aware that such an update to the website is going to >>>> necessitate quite some rewrite of the documentation. Yeah... But we need to >>>> start from somewhere. >> > > >
