Its version is currently 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT but I don’t know why. I think it should 
be set to 1.0.0.  We aren’t going to do a release of log4j-tools very often. 
Certainly not as frequently as log4j itself. It hardly ever changes.  It needs 
an independent versioning scheme.

Ralph

> On Dec 10, 2020, at 1:50 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the log4j-tools version should be set to 2.14.0 for a RC to match
> the release of log4j. Thoughts?
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 15:45 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
>> OK. Then I guess I forgot since it has been so long.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Dec 10, 2020, at 1:09 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But there *is* an allowed list of Java classes and packages configured
>>> in org.apache.logging.log4j.util.FilteredObjectInputStream which the
>>> log4j-server module's servers uses through
>> ObjectInputStreamLogEventBridge.
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:33 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> There is a Jira issue to do that but as far as I know the Security bug
>> was
>>>> never addressed in that code. In a quick glance at it I still see it
>>>> supporting Java serialized objects without any kind of whitelisting. I
>>>> don’t see anything in that repo besides the log server and I wouldn’t
>> want
>>>> to release something with known security problems.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 3, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi All:
>>>>> 
>>>>> We've never released from
>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j-tools.git and I'm
>>>>> currently using a SNAPSHOT build. Any thoughts on releasing from there?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to