The artifacts have been committed to 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/log4net/.

Ralph

> On Sep 11, 2020, at 9:44 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> Davyd,
> 
> That makes 3 +1 PMC votes so you may proceed with the release.  Please update 
> the web site before you publish to NuGet. I will copy the artifacts to the 
> release distribution area for you.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Sep 11, 2020, at 8:19 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
>> them.
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, 08:08 Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> Remko.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 10, 2020, at 15:24, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all
>>>> 
>>>> I realise that I'm causing a bit of a headache by sending mails from my
>>> work account. I'm trying to be more vigilant when sending from my mail
>>> client, but perhaps I need to find a better way, because I just managed to
>>> send again from that account this morning, and I understand that may mean
>>> that messages aren't getting through. I apologise, especially to Ralph,
>>> who, I understand, has had to manually marshal some of my mails through ):
>>>> 
>>>> Please can we get a vote going on this release as it
>>>> a) sorts out the CVE that people have been so interested in
>>>> b) improves things significantly for netstandard 2.0 users
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -d
>>>> On 2020/09/07 21:15:42, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dominik
>>>> No, it doesn't. Netstandard 2.0 support is added in addition to the
>>> existing netstandard 1.3 target.
>>>> Whilst I'd really like to diminish the target list of the package
>>> (particularly the client profile targets), I'd only be comfortable doing so
>>> on a major version change, and I think that mostly I just want to deprecate
>>> client profiles to enable easier cross-platform dev (those are the only
>>> targets I haven't had joy supporting on Linux so far)
>>>> -d
>>>> 
>>>> On September 7, 2020 19:55:51 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>> Does this break support for netstandard1.3 and enforces users to update
>>> all
>>>> their dependants?
>>>> Best regards
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
>>>> them.
>>>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020, 21:04 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to propose a vote to release 2.0.10 of log4net, with:
>>>> - updated netstandard 2.0 support from community member NicholasNoise
>>>> - cherry-picked fix for CVE-2018-1285 (I had to modify slightly since the
>>>> mechanism used there is outdated for netstandard 2.0, but the principle
>>>> stands
>>>> 
>>>> I've created an RC release at
>>>> GitHub:
>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/v2.0.10-rc1 [
>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/v2.0.10-rc1] and
>>>> pushed updated site material to the `asf-staging` branch of the
>>>> logging-log4net-site repo.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -d
>>> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to